The case for Sensemaking audits

Over the last 3 years, throughout the world, organisations have received the most extreme brutal audit of their capacity to cope with a large-scale novel event. Whether it was the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine or the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, the ensuing turbulance and uncertainty has made confident decision making even more critical. The scale and impact of these events have had an overwhelming emotional impact on millions of people, resulting, in many instances, in a breakdown of their individual and collective sensemaking capabilities.

The oft-quoted, but truncated, Ram Emanuel aphorism clearly captures the potential for building strength from this context,

You never let a serious crisis go to waste’. What few go on to more accurately provide is that the advice concludes ‘…’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.’  

We would add that not only is it an opportunity, but the risks are less because there is an expectation that leaders must try to do things differently.

Leaders should take the opportunity of checking the organisational sensemaking capability of their own organisations because every organisation has its own more nuanced brutal audits when faced with having to manage the unexpected in the form of ongoing events that challenge prevailing assumptions and coping mechanisms.

Put simply, Individual Sensemaking is the way that humans process information in order to create meaning from situations that they face. Put less simply our brains sift situations for clues that fit past frames of reference (events) and then form tightly or loosely held meanings which enable people to make decisions and take actions.

Organisational Sensemaking is the collective social processing of information, however incomplete, that results in the creation of meaning (not always shared equally), decision-making and actions.

The caveats above (the number of variabilities in any social enterprise) create a deliberate sense of the imprecise nature and quality of Organisational Sensemaking. This situation worsens because people have a natural tendency, when considering unfolding events, to over credit the past and superimpose previous meaning and thus decision-making onto present situations. In novel and fast-moving situations this can quickly get organisations into deep trouble which is why Organisational Sensemaking is widely used as the research methodology for the investigation of major disasters and events in which social action has either created the disaster or made it worse. However, the quality of Organisational Sensemaking is the critical determining factor for the success of all organisations faced with new situations, not purely those engaged in life threatening situations.

The better the sensemaking processes, the better the decision-making and the better the outcomes. You can watch a short video here which explains more.

Sensemaking Audit
March 20, 2023

The Case for Sensemaking Audits

Creating the right organisational culture and psychological safety necessary to give voice to quiet, diffident and dissenting colleagues is a laudable ambition.

April 21, 2021

Don’t let facts get in the way of the right story

In Justin Bariso’s article about the right and wrong way to conduct a discussion, he points to the role that emotions play in persuading people to accept or reject your ideas. If, like a prosecutor looking for a win in a high-profile trial, you bombard people with facts and evidence, then there is a significant […]

April 1, 2021

Dark side of working from home

Goldman Sachs has had so much business and is doing so well in the pandemic that at least for some junior investment analysts it allegedly means working 100 hour weeks, leaving very little time to sleep, eat and wash. Some might have little sympathy for junior analysts on first year salaries and bonuses averaging $123,500 […]

March 9, 2021

Micromanagement is not the answer

In an excellent article about the challenges of staying in touch with your team in this era of necessary isolation, Kerry Goyette explains why some leaders resort to micromanagement. Micromanagement is often not a preferred leadership style but caused by a feeling that leaders are losing control when they don’t see their teams working as […]

January 8, 2021

Are CEOs getting all the information they need?

Being a CEO is a tough job, especially if you are CEO of a start-up. Bringing information to light about what employees think in an easily understood form, alongside financial information in the BI dashboard would significantly expand the CEO’s knowledge about her or his company.

December 21, 2020

White paper by Doctor Mike Carter: Philosophy of the Tensense Model

Organisational Inquiry: General and Simple to Simple and Accurate Leaders Acknowledging Trade-Offs  Curious leaders want to know what’s going on in their organisations, the issues that might be impeding high performance and what their colleagues are really thinking. Curious and determined leaders make it their business to find out the answers to these questions, but […]

December 17, 2020

What should startups digest?

Startups coming to market with a new product are faced with significant challenges. Is their product too much like an existing product or is it so novel that potential customers don’t understand its value or are sceptical?

November 6, 2020

Amplifying the quiet voices

Creating the right organisational culture and psychological safety necessary to give voice to quiet, diffident and dissenting colleagues is a laudable ambition.

November 5, 2020

It’s all about the dashboard!

Most leaders, even if they don’t have a “business intelligence dashboard’ will use key data and KPIs to help them manage the business, spot opportunities and improve performance.